AI-Enabled GTM for Private Equity: 2026 Playbook - The GTM with Clay Blog
Claygent Builder: The easiest way to build, test, and deploy GTM Agents
Build production-ready Claygents in natural language with Sculptor. Test on real data for free, track versions, and deploy once across every workflow. All inside Clay.
How Clay Uses Clay Ads: From $250 to $25 CPL
See how Clay uses its own Ads feature to cut LinkedIn CPL from $250 to $25 and unlock Meta with enriched CRM audiences. No manual uploads needed.
HG Insights Corporate Hierarchy: GTM Precision in Clay
Use HG Insights corporate hierarchy data in Clay to clean CRMs, map parent-child accounts, and trigger expansion plays. See how it works.
Sales GTM Engineering: How Clay Built the Role From Scratch
Learn what sales GTM engineering is, how it collapses SDR, AE, and SE roles into one, and how Clay built and hires for this high-leverage function. See how it works.
How to Automate Inbound Lead Outreach: The Clay Playbook
Learn how to automate inbound lead outreach with enrichment, scoring, and personalized sequences. See the exact Clay workflow that runs without manual work.
demandDrive Joins Clay’s Partner Ecosystem as an Official Clay Studio Partner
demandDrive joins Clay’s partner ecosystem to help B2B teams turn account intelligence into pipeline and revenue with GTM engineering and automation.
B2B Sales Prospecting: 15 Strategies to Drive More Conversions
Master B2B sales prospecting with 15 proven strategies covering ICP building, multi-channel outreach, and list hygiene. Build a pipeline that converts.
AI Sales Assistants: 11 Ways to Accelerate Your Outbound
Discover 11 ways AI sales assistants automate lead research, enrichment, and email personalization. See how top B2B teams use them to accelerate outbound.
The Three Laws of GTM: How to Win in the AI Era
The three laws of GTM explain why uniqueness, saturation, and iteration speed determine who wins. Learn how AI changes the rules and what to do about it.
Best Work Email Finders by Segment: SMB vs. Enterprise
We tested 12 email finders across 4,700+ contacts to find the best work emails by segment. See accuracy, cost, and coverage winners for SMB and enterprise.
How Clay Converts Trial Users Into Customers With Automated Outreach
See how Clay uses automated outreach to convert trial users into customers, with enrichment, lead scoring, and personalized HubSpot campaigns. Learn how.
Best Mobile Phone Data Providers for B2B Sales Teams
We tested 9,806 numbers across 10 B2B mobile phone data providers. See which wins on accuracy, coverage, and cost for NAMER, EMEA, and APAC.
How to Build a Complete AI Outbound Sales Funnel
Learn how to build a complete AI outbound sales funnel—from account scoring to personalized outreach—using Clay waterfalls and automation. See how it works.
How to Get More Customers Using Outbound Sales: A Complete Guide
Learn how outbound sales works, who it's right for, and how to build a strategy from prospecting to closing. Covers cold calling, email, and more.
How to Automate 6 Cold Email Campaigns in One Clay Workflow
Learn how to automate 6 cold email campaigns from a single Clay table — with enrichment, AI classification, and deduplication built in. See how it works.
How Clay Identifies Tier 1 Accounts: A Three-Score System
See how Clay identifies tier 1 accounts using a three-score system: fit, engagement, and contract value. Learn how sales and marketing align on the same priorities.
Lead Scoring in Clay: A Step-by-Step Formula Guide
Learn how to build lead scoring formulas in Clay to prioritize your ICP leads by employee count, job postings, and more. See how it works.
How to Validate Cold Outbound Offers and Find Message-Market Fit
Learn how to validate cold outbound offers by finding message-market fit — from breaking down your value prop to testing with a phased email approach. See how it works.
Troubleshooting Outbound Sales and Prospecting: A Comprehensive Guide
Fix broken outbound sales campaigns with this guide. Diagnose open and reply rates, reduce no-shows, qualify prospects with MEDDIC, and optimize what's working.
Bulk Enrichment: Enrich Millions of CRM Records in Clay
Bulk enrichment lets Enterprise teams enrich millions of Salesforce records with firmographics, tech stack, and AI research — then write results back automatically.
Clay Templates: Automate, Customize, and Replicate Any GTM Workflow
Clay Templates let you replicate full GTM workflows in hours, not days. Automate prospecting from data scraping to AI messaging, free and fully customizable.
How to Optimize Your Credit Usage in Clay
Learn how to optimize your credit usage in Clay with conditional formulas, Clearbit waterfall lookups, and smarter enrichment workflows. Save credits fast.
AI for sales prospecting
Learn about how to use AI for sales prospecting in this comprehensive guide, including framework for creating AI prompts and examples of cold email templates using AI that real sales teams have used successfully to land clients. AI sales prospecting can save your team thousands of hours—and double or triple your positive response rates.
The Reverse Demo: How Clay Replaced Traditional B2B Sales Demos
A reverse demo lets prospects solve real problems live, guided by your rep. Learn how Clay used 100+ sessions to boost conversion, retention, and product quality.
Data Waterfalls: How to Maximize Contact Coverage with Clay
Data waterfalls query multiple providers in sequence so you only pay for matches. See how Clay pushes coverage from 30% to 80%+ without annual contracts.
How Clay Runs ABM Campaigns: A Step-by-Step Playbook
See how Clay runs ABM campaigns — scoring 300 accounts, personalizing mailers and landing pages, and automating SDR follow-up. Learn how.
How We Built Clay's GTM Engineering Function
See how Clay built its GTM engineering function with sprint-based delivery, founder-level reporting, and full sales automation. A practical inside look.
Best Personal Email Finder Tools: Tested and Ranked
We tested 5 personal email finder tools across 2,354 prospects. See accuracy, coverage, and pricing data — plus the waterfall order that hit 79% coverage.
How to Use OpenAI to Write Cold Emails from Scratch with Clay
Learn how to use OpenAI to write personalized cold emails at scale with Clay. Set up the integration, craft better prompts, and boost deliverability.
How to Run a Personalized Demo Play at Scale with Clay
Learn how to automate a personalized demo play using Clay, Claygent, and AI enrichment to build custom mockups at scale. See how it works.
Automated Slide Deck Creation: How Clay Builds QBRs from Your Data
Clay's automated slide deck creation pulls from Snowflake, Salesforce, and Gong to build QBRs in minutes. Save 90+ hours per quarter. See how it works.
HG Insights + Clay: B2B Technographic and Firmographic Data
HG Insights surfaces deep technographic and firmographic data from billions of documents. Use it in Clay workflows to enrich accounts and power GTM. See how it works.
B2B Cold Email Deliverability: 21 Best Practices
Master B2B cold email deliverability with 21 proven best practices: domain setup, inbox warmup, authentication, and copy tips that keep you out of spam. Learn how.
Basics of Google Search Operators: A Practical Guide
Learn the basics of Google Search Operators and how to use them in Clay for prospecting, list building, and company research. See how it works.
AI Lead Generation: The Complete B2B Guide
Learn how AI lead generation automates list building, enrichment, and personalized outreach for B2B teams. Scale your pipeline without scaling headcount. See how it works.
Clay MCP: Ops-built workflows, consumable by reps
Clay MCP: Ops-built workflows, consumable by reps
How to Manage and Enrich Inbound Leads Automatically
Learn how to manage and enrich inbound leads automatically using a four-phase workflow that scores, segments, and triggers outreach from one email. See how it works.
GTM Alpha: How Winning Teams Build a Competitive Edge
GTM alpha is the edge winning teams build with unique data and signal-based plays. Learn how to find hidden signals, run better plays, and outpace competitors.
Why Good CRM Data Matters and How Clay Helps
Poor CRM data kills outreach. Learn why CRM data coverage fails and how Clay's waterfall enrichment lifts coverage rates from 20% to 80%. See how it works.
How to Use Formulas in Clay: AI Generator and Manual Entry
Learn how to use formulas in Clay with the AI Formula Generator or manual entry. Transform and clean your data faster. See how it works.
GTM Engineering: What It Is, How It Works, and How to Hire
GTM engineering turns ops teams into revenue builders using AI and automation. Learn what GTM engineers do, how to structure the role, and how to hire one.
Formulas in Clay: A Beginner's Intro for Non-Engineers
Learn how to use formulas in Clay without coding. This intro covers conditional statements, combining columns, and auto-qualifying leads. Start in 30 minutes.
How Clay Uses Clay for SEO and AEO: 3 Systems That Scale
See how Clay uses Clay for SEO and AEO: automated content refresh, video-to-page conversion, and a custom AI visibility dashboard. Learn how.
Turn Web Visitors into Leads: A Warm Outbound Play for B2B Sales
Learn how to turn web visitors into leads using a warm outbound play for B2B sales — with RB2B, Clay, and Lemlist. See how it works.
How to Use Web Scraping to Enrich Your Data with Clay
Learn how to use web scraping to enrich your data without code. Clay's Claygent answers deep GTM research questions at scale. See how it works.
How to Create a Sales Prospect List in Minutes
Learn how to create your own sales prospect list in minutes using Clay. Pull from 40+ sources, enrich with ICP data, and export to your CRM. See how it works.
Best B2B Email List Providers: Tested and Ranked (2026)
We tested 8 B2B email list providers head-to-head. See accuracy results, per-email pricing, and how to waterfall providers for maximum coverage.
Outbound Sales Automation: How to 10x Pipeline Without More SDRs
Learn how outbound sales automation replaces manual SDR work, cuts cost per email by 100x, and scales pipeline without growing headcount. See how it works.
The Wake the Dead Play: Reactivate Closed-Lost Deals with Clay
The wake the dead play uses Clay + ChatGPT to send automated, personalized emails to closed-lost prospects. Restart stalled deals in a few steps. Learn how.
Three Tips to Guarantee Email Deliverability for Cold Outbound
Split volume, verify contacts, and personalize copy to guarantee email deliverability for cold outbound. Three actionable tips that keep you out of spam.
How Clay Uses Clay for Customer Support: 3 Real Workflows
See how Clay's customer support team uses Clay to enrich Intercom tickets, automate QA, and draft help articles. Real workflows, real results.
B2B Cold Email Copywriting: The Complete Guide
Master B2B cold email copywriting with proven templates, a research framework, and a checklist used to send 800k+ emails a month. Start writing emails that get replies.
Introducing Clay Functions
Build Your GTM Logic Once, Apply It Everywhere
Clay and Apollo Integration: Enrichment, Sequencing, and More
The Clay and Apollo integration unlocks 5X faster enrichment and direct sequencer API access. See how joint customers go from data to booked meetings.
The Many Lives of Spreadsheets: A History and What Comes Next
Explore the many lives of spreadsheets — from VisiCalc in 1979 to self-filling automation tools today. See how the no-code vision keeps evolving.
AI recruiting strategies
Learn our top AI recruiting workflows to help you identify, research, and reach out to qualified candidates for open roles. AI can eliminate manual work and help you reach out to—and land—better employees for your clients.
How to Hire a GTM Engineer: The Complete Guide
Learn how to hire a GTM engineer: when to make the hire, what skills to screen for, red flags to avoid, and where to find the best candidates. See how it works.
Inside Clay's GTM Engineering Lab: Plays, Principles, and Automation
See how Clay's GTM engineering lab turns internal problems into revenue plays using AI, automation, and data-driven principles. Learn how it works.
How to Build the Most Targeted Account Lists Possible
Generic tools leave bad-fit companies in your account list. Learn how to build targeted account lists using AI enrichment and real workflow examples in Clay.
Personalized Direct Mail at Scale: The Gifting Play with Clay
Learn how to run personalized direct mail campaigns using Clay — validate contacts, generate AI gift copy, and export to email. See how it works.
How to Set Up Your Full Inbound Sales Process on Clay
Learn how to set up your full inbound sales process on Clay — enrich leads, tag MQLs, and automate email campaigns from form to demo. See how it works.
AI-Enabled GTM for Private Equity: The Value Creation Playbook
Learn how AI-enabled GTM for private equity drives value creation across portfolios—from data quality to agentic workflows. See how it works.
Do More With Your Data: Clay's Post-Data-Provider Approach
Clay's post-data-provider approach combines 150+ providers, waterfall enrichment, and AI scraping to maximize data coverage. See how it works.
Google Maps Lead Generation for Niche Local Businesses
Learn how to use Google Maps lead generation to find niche local businesses, enrich owner contacts, and send personalized outreach at scale with Clay.
24 AI Email Personalization Examples for Cold Outreach (With Prompts)
Get 24 AI email personalization examples for cold outreach, with ChatGPT prompts you can run at scale in Clay. Learn how to write emails that actually convert.
How to Ace Your Follow-Ups: A Practical Sales Guide
Learn how to ace your follow-ups with value-driven outreach, personalization tips, multi-channel tactics, and automation tools that keep deals moving. See how it works.
How to Prioritize Your Waitlist with Lead Enrichment
Learn how to prioritize your waitlist using lead enrichment. Turn raw signups into qualified leads by company, title, and role — no long forms needed. See how.
B2B Cold Email Templates: Frameworks That Get Replies
Learn how to write B2B cold email templates that convert with a proven 5-part framework, follow-up strategy, and real examples. See how it works.
Audiences: now in Enterprise beta
Clay Audiences unifies your CRM, product data, and intent signals into one layer — so reps and agents can run precise, personalized GTM plays at scale.
The thinking behind our new pricing: our internal memo
Clay pricing memo: INTERNAL
Introducing Clay’s new pricing
Today, we’re launching a pricing update that reduces data costs, and simplifies and improves the value of our plans. Our goal is to have Clay be your default tool for GTM Engineering.
Clay partners with Lusha and Beauhurst to expand European data coverage
Lusha adds lookalike prospecting, contact enrichment, and signals in EMEA. Beauhurst adds private funding and corporate structure data in the UK and Germany.
Source your precise TAM from lookalikes you can trust with Ocean.io and Clay
Clay + Ocean now enable preview-based B2B lookalike discovery. Preview leads before committing credits and expand your TAM with greater precision.
Clay doubles down on supporting European GTM teams
Clay's waterfall enrichment delivers 2–3x more mobile phone coverage than leading solo providers across Europe. Plus new data partnerships, a London office, and timezone-aligned support.
In Nigeria, she built a life where money wouldn’t decide
Clay blog | In Nigeria, she built a life where money wouldn’t decide
Sculptor Analyst Mode: Turning Context-Rich Data Into Actionable GTM Insights
Gather business intelligence and share documents of this analysis directly from Sculptor
In a place where girls often choose between career or marriage, she carved her own path
Javeria Shah won the Clay Cup 2025 despite being denied a US visa and competing remotely from Pakistan. Learn how she transitioned from electronics engineering into GTM engineering and built her own business.
How we designed Sculpt
Our first conference, Sculpt, is where the analog soul of Clay met the digital mind of Clay.
Clay announces second employee tender offer in nine months at a $5B valuation
A rare repeat employee liquidity event, designed to give builders flexibility as Clay accelerates
Clay is now available as a connector in Claude
Bring Clay's contact databases, enrichment providers, and AI agents into your Claude workflow.
Sellers have a new AI edge: Clay in ChatGPT
Use Clay directly in ChatGPT to find the right buyers, research people and companies, and draft personalized outbound. One conversation, powered by live GTM data.
Clay reaches $100M ARR
Clay has crossed $100M ARR, growing from $1M to $100M in two years after six years of foundational product work. The milestone reflects durable customer adoption, efficient growth, and an ecosystem of GTM builders using Clay to power their business.
Clay Certifications: Turning mastery into credentials that matter
The Clay education team has built a certification program that runs entirely on Clay and gives users credentials that actually matter
Mobile Phone Verification Methodology
Clay has partnered with The Kiln to setup a series of large-scale data test across mobile phone, work email, personal email, email verification, and more. Below, we explain the approach to these tests.
Work Email Verification Methodology
Clay has partnered with The Kiln to setup a series of large-scale data test across mobile phone, work email, personal email, email verification, and more. Below, we explain the approach to these tests.
Stop Guessing, Start Analyzing: How Sculptor Turns Your GTM Data Into Your Competitive Advantage
Analyze your GTM data with Sculptor to turn fragmented information into actionable insight.
Find and outreach local businesses with Openmart and Clay Sequencer
Get the right contacts for local businesses without stitching together multiple tools or wasting valuable time on setup instead of selling.
Announcing Web Intent
Use Website Intent in Clay to see which companies visit your site, track engagement, and trigger personalized GTM plays. Turn website traffic into real buyer intent data.
How Clay Uses Clay: Conversational Data
How we use Clay to mine millions of pages of call transcripts to generate revenue, and how you can use it too.
Sculpting GTM’s future with six major launches
Today at Sculpt, we're launching six major features that will help teams turn any growth idea into reality faster.
Introducing Claygent Navigator
A new Claygent model that can use a browser to take actions and extract information from webpages.
Announcing the Clay Partner Program
The Clay Partner Program is to a partner, what a toolbox is to an artist. It keeps essential resources within reach and grows more sophisticated as your expertise develops. We've designed everything around one simple principle: helping you grow your business as Clay grows.
Introducing GPT-5 in Claygent: sharper research, stronger formulas, better outbound
GPT-5 is now a model option across Clay, bringing the best research and conversational writing we've ever shipped to your GTM workflows.
Clay Series C announcement. The GTM engineering era begins now
We raised a $100M Series C at a $3.1B valuation to power GTM engineering!
Claygent surpasses 1 billion runs
The world's most loved AI research agent in GTM has passes a huge milestone at 1 billion runs.
Announcing Sculpt: Clay’s first annual user conference
Join us for Sculpt, Clay’s first annual user conference on Sept 17 in San Francisco where GTM leaders build AI workflows, share creative tactics, and get early access to new features.
Announcing custom signals at Clay
Clay's new custom signals platform helps sales teams track unique data changes that indicate buying opportunities. Turn any data point into a sales signal, enrich with context, and automate personalized outreach to find GTM alpha your competitors miss.
Clay announces employee tender offer led by Sequoia at $1.5B valuation
Clay allows employees to sell vested shares for immediate liquidity through a $20M tender offer at a $1.5B valuation. With 10x revenue growth in 2022-2023 and serving 8,000+ customers including OpenAI and Hubspot, Clay continues to change how businesses approach go-to-market strategies with their AI agent Claygent.
Create personalized presentations at scale with Clay and Google Slides
Automate personalized sales decks with Clay’s Google Slides integration. Instantly generate tailored presentations for leads, customers, QBRs, and internal updates. Use one template to create hundreds of presentations at scale.
Turn Gong conversations into automated GTM workflows
Clay now integrates with Gong—turn messy call transcripts into powerful automations in Salesforce, HubSpot, Notion, Slack, Google Sheets, and 100+ other integrations.
Product
Use Cases
Solutions
Resources
Company
Pricing
Features
.
Additional
How Clay uses Clay
LinkedIn + Meta Ads on Autopilot
CRM enrichment
Keep your CRM clean with the highest quality data
BY TEAM
BY STAGE
BY CUSTOMERS
Merge
Link long form description will go in this slot here.
Exit Five
Link long form description will go in this slot here.
Terrapinn
Link long form description will go in this slot here.
Harmonic
Link long form description will go in this slot here.
Oyster
Link long form description will go in this slot here.
Intercom
Grew their outbound-sourced pipeline by +140%
START GROWING
DISCOVER
Community
PARTNER WITH US
Clay Commnity
In Nigeria, she built a life where money wouldn’t decide
OUR COMPANY
GET IN TOUCH
SOCIALS
Article – NY Times
Clay allows employees to sell shares at a $5b valuation.
AI-Enabled GTM for Private Equity: The Value Creation Playbook
The pace of change in AI is disorienting. Models turn over faster than planning cycles, the vendor landscape has sprawled into hundreds of tools all claiming to transform your commercial motion, and the rate of iteration is accelerating. This is landing at a particularly consequential moment for PE: the low-interest-rate era, when financial engineering could do most of the heavy lifting in value creation, is behind us. The firms generating the best returns today are doing it through operational improvement, and GTM has become a critical lever. Hiring at portcos is increasingly oriented around commercial capability, and the question of how to scale revenue without proportionally scaling headcount has moved to the center of every value creation conversation.
The result is a specific kind of anxiety we hear about constantly from GTM leaders and PE operators alike: an overwhelming desire to do something with AI, combined with genuine uncertainty about what that something is. Some functions have found clarity. For example, engineering and support both have trackable ROI and relatively contained error costs. GTM is different and we wrote about why in Three Laws of GTM:
"Generic outreach is just noise. You win by knowing something about your customers that competitors don't… Your only sustainable advantage is your ability to discover new advantages faster than competitors."
Iterative speed, then, is AI's real differentiator in GTM. Most PE portfolios have already extracted the easier efficiency gains of AI: chatbots, support deflection, coding assistants as cost-savings plays. But the real GTM upside is about agility. As Clay's cofounder Varun Anand alludes to in Hg's Orbit podcast, GTM alpha: the edge that lets you win deals competitors can't now erodes in two weeks rather than three months. The companies that win are no longer the ones who find one great campaign and scale it. They're the ones who can discover new advantages continuously, faster than competitors can copy them.
That adaptive philosophy is what we at Clay bring to our work with PE firms and their portfolios. We're working with Hg, a leading investor in European and transatlantic technology and services businesses with over $100 billion in assets under management. 62% of their portfolio companies are now in active pilots or implementation phase (read more here). What follows is the playbook we've developed from our work with Hg and a few other PE partners.
TL;DR
- AI-enabled GTM is now a primary value creation lever for PE: the biggest gains are in sales productivity and GTM automation, not just engineering or support cost reduction.
- Not all AI GTM tools are production-ready. Account research, enrichment, and rep-in-the-loop workflows deliver reliable ROI today. Fully autonomous outbound SDRs consistently underperform and damage domain reputation.
- Data quality is the highest-ROI starting point. Portcos that fix contact coverage and CRM hygiene first see faster, more durable downstream gains from every subsequent AI workflow.
- AI-enabled GTM compounds across a portfolio. PE firms that standardize GTM infrastructure across portcos can identify winning playbooks at one company and deploy them across ten others, faster than any single company can replicate alone.
How AI-Enabled GTM Is Reshaping the Rule of 40
PE-backed software companies live and die by the Rule of 40: a company's combined revenue growth rate and profit margin should exceed 40%. That benchmark is about to shift structurally, and the GTM function is one of the areas where the shift will be most pronounced.
Two cost lines are already compressing measurably. AI code assistants are delivering 20–45% productivity gains per developer, according to McKinsey's controlled studies of engineering spend. AI-powered support tools like Intercom Fin, Decagon, and Sierra are handling tier-one tickets and routine triage at scale. Real, capturable gains, and increasingly, a floor-level expectation among sophisticated buyers evaluating software companies.
The less-explored frontier is S&M. Sales and marketing runs at 20–50% of revenue in growth-stage B2B SaaS; it's routinely the single largest cost line in a portfolio company's P&L. The reason it's less explored isn't that the opportunity is smaller, but rather that GTM is harder to automate after all. But for operators who understand how to sequence the rollout, the math is compelling. Agentic workflows can compress BDR research, targeting, personalization, and execution time spent and in turn drives up the pipeline and revenue per rep.
The growth-side math is equally compelling, and it typically starts with something simpler than operators expect: data quality. When a portco increases contact coverage through filling gaps in enrichment, cleaning duplicates, and building a more complete org-level picture of the ICP, the downstream effect is real. For example, Verkada increased contact data coverage in their TAM from 50% to 80%. Reps reach the right people on the first contact, expansion workflows fire on complete records and automated targeting becomes reliable. That 30% data fix translates directly to pipeline and revenue. It's also usually the highest-ROI intervention available at the start of a transformation, because everything downstream depends on and benefits from it.
There's a second dimension worth highlighting here as portcos make decisions on GTM vendors. There are often 10 or more point solutions that make up a typical portco's GTM stack: everything from workflow tools to enrichment vendors to sequencing platforms. And they are all under competitive pressure from AI. Agentic coding tools now allow startups to replicate mid-market SaaS functionality in weeks, undercutting legacy pricing models and forcing enterprise buyers to ask whether they should build rather than buy. This makes the infrastructure-versus-tooling distinction more consequential than it might appear in a normal market. Point solutions built around automating a specific manual workflow face a different competitive dynamic than infrastructure built around orchestrating data and driving action across the commercial function. The former can be replicated, but the latter compounds with use. In other words, GTM vendor decisions at portcos aren't purely a procurement call, but a compounding infrastructure decision: one that will determine how fast the commercial function learns, adapts, and widens its lead over the next five years.
What Works, What Doesn't, and Why Most Vendor Pitches Get It Wrong
PE operating partners are sitting through a lot of vendor pitches right now. There are autonomous SDR companies, AI email platforms, and "agentic outbound" startups galore. A handful will generate real returns. The majority will burn through budget and erode organizational trust in AI as a category, the kind of damage that takes quarters to repair and makes every subsequent implementation harder to justify internally.
From our vantage point working closely with GTM teams and seeing how hundreds of mid market and enterprise companies structure their GTM workflows, the landscape breaks into three tiers.
Production-ready today: account research and enrichment, company scoring with transparent logic, and pre-meeting preparation that combines CRM history with third-party enrichment. These work for a specific reason: the correctness bar is relatively low, outputs are easy for a human to validate in seconds, and mistakes don't damage customer relationships. A company score reading '85: hiring RevOps, raised Series B, matches ICP on six dimensions' is useful at 80% accuracy, and it gets better as the data improves. For a 50-person sales team taking four meetings daily, automated research reclaims 50+ hours per week, which is the equivalent of a full-time research analyst.
Rep-in-the-loop workflows: personalized messaging, contact prioritization, and basic objection handling. The consistent pattern here is AI drafts, humans validate before anything reaches a prospect. A rep can review ten AI-generated emails in the time it takes to write two from scratch. But removing the human review step introduces error rates on three fronts: tone, relevance, and factual accuracy. All three damage response rates and brand perception in ways that compound over time. The economics still favor a human-reviewed AI workflow over a fully manual one, and in our experience, reps prefer it once they've used it for a week.
Not ready for production yet (this is where most of the damage happens): fully autonomous outbound SDRs, where AI handles TAM sourcing, targeting, messaging, sending, objection handling, and meeting booking without human involvement. The failure pattern is remarkably consistent. Week one it looks promising with a few meetings booked and enough to generate false confidence. Week two, open rates decline as the system trains spam filters against the company domain. Week three, messaging quality degrades with no learning loop but repetition at scale. By month one, it burned through target accounts, damaged domain reputation, and generated minimal pipelines.
One thing we hear consistently from operators who've been through successful implementations is that the technology is the easy part; the harder challenge is change management which includes re-skilling GTM leadership and practitioners to think differently about their work in an AI-native environment. Long-entrenched workflows, quarterly campaign planning, and siloed team structures don't change just because a new tool gets deployed. Leaders need to invest in helping their people develop new mental models alongside the new infrastructure.
We have seen repeatedly that starting with narrow, high-accuracy use cases like account research, intent signal tracking, pre-meeting briefs, inbound qualification and routing and expanding from there consistently outperforms broad deployments that spread across too many tasks at once.
One caveat to this framing: these tiers shift as the technology matures. What's unreliable today may be production-ready in a matter of months to years. The evaluation framework stays constant regardless: assess accuracy in context, measure the cost of errors, decide whether human oversight is worth the throughput tradeoff, and revisit the tier placement quarterly.
AI-Enabled GTM in Action: Portfolio Company Results
A-LIGN (Hg portfolio company) is a cybersecurity compliance firm serving 5,000+ organizations globally. The starting point was familiar to anyone who's audited a portco's commercial function. A-LIGN was paying $60K annually for a contractor to manually research 2,000 accounts over six months. The output was a spreadsheet with basic yes/no answers: Does this company do SOC 2 audits? Yes. Does it have a compliance program? Yes. Accurate, but thin, and not particularly actionable.
Their ops leader identified the core problem clearly: the data told reps that a company does SOC 2 audits, but what reps actually needed to know was who does their SOC 2 and why. Which competitor holds the relationship? What's the contract cycle? What compliance framework gaps exist? The data wasn't actionable. It was a filing cabinet with 2,000 folders and no context inside any of them.
Building automated research workflows on Clay, A-LIGN replaced six months of manual work with one month of automated execution. 30,000 basic data points became 450,000 detailed insights, a 15x increase in data depth at a cost of $50K for the platform, down from $60K for the manual contractor. At the same time, Salesforce admin work dropped from 48 hours to 2 hours per cycle.
Now, instead of telling reps "this company does compliance," the system showed which specific services they used, why they needed them, which competitors held the relationship, and where the switching triggers were. That intelligence powered a competitive displacement workflow that hadn't existed before without the data layer underneath it. This resulted in $5.7M in qualified pipeline from competitive displacement research alone and $3.3M in closed revenue directly attributed to displacement intelligence.
The cultural shift that followed may be the most durable outcome. Non-technical reps started defaulting to "can we automate this?" when they hit a manual process. A-LIGN now treats Clay as core revenue infrastructure, a difference between a software purchase and an operating and cultural shift.
Terrapinn, a global B2B events company with 150 sales reps covering 35 industry verticals, had a different bottleneck: their third-party data provider delivered static lists with no enrichment, no signals, and no context about why a prospect belonged at a specific event. Clay replaced months of researcher work with enriched, signal-based prospect lists built in minutes, ICP-matched across all 35 verticals, updated in real time. Revenue per rep increased 19% while prospect acquisition cost dropped 90%. For a 150-person sales organization, that combination changes the unit economics of the commercial model materially.
Recharge, the subscription billing platform processing $30 billion annually for 20,000+ merchants, had the opposite problem. They weren't missing data but had ten years of customer and product data sitting in siloed systems. Clay unified and connected it to campaign execution. One campaign per quarter became eight simultaneous campaigns. Opportunity conversion improved 20%, meeting conversion improved 12%, and call conversion improved 8x. Instead of adding net new data points, Clay made the existing data actionable.
These aren't isolated wins. They're outputs of the same underlying architecture which is vertical-agnostic by design. A-LIGN's workflow runs on enriched account intelligence, competitor relationship mapping, and contract cycle signals. Terrapinn's runs on enriched firmographics and event-matched ICPs. Recharge's runs on unified product data connected to campaign execution. The surface details differ by industry but the underlying architecture stays the same. A workflow built for cybersecurity compliance can be reconfigured for healthcare SaaS, professional services, or fintech with the inputs swapped and the logic intact as the underlying pattern is always the same: source, enrich, score, trigger, and act. That's what makes GTM playbook building a compounding asset for PE operators specifically. Each implementation produces a documented template and makes the next deployment faster and cheaper.
The Diligence Red Flag Isn't the Metrics
The most important thing to understand about AI-enabled GTM is that it compounds. A company that builds clean data infrastructure, instruments its signals, and connects those signals to automated action gets more efficient and more intelligent over time. More campaigns generate more outcome data, better outcome data improves targeting and better targeting improves conversion. Higher conversion funds more experimentation. Each cycle tightens the loop. The advantage is exponential.
Companies without data and orchestration infrastructure can't access this loop. They run campaigns manually, gather data inconsistently, and make decisions on intuition or lagging reports. Each quarter, they're roughly as good at GTM as they were the quarter before. Meanwhile, the company with the right infrastructure layer is compounding. That gap is what we suspect sophisticated buyers are beginning to price into diligence.
"Clean, enriched CRM data is now table stakes across the portfolio, you can't run a modern GTM organization without it," said Jack Claydon, AI Value Creation at Hg. "What's exciting is what comes next: orchestration workflows that automate key commercial processes, driving efficiency gains whilst simultaneously improving sales performance. That's where the real value creation is happening."
The metrics that surface it aren't new, but their interpretation has changed. Historically, a declining win rate or rising CAC was a signal of execution problems: the wrong messaging, the wrong reps, or the wrong segments. Today those same signals increasingly indicate a structural deficit including the absence of feedback infrastructure that would have caught and corrected those problems automatically. The question a buyer is now asking isn't just "why are these numbers bad?" It's "does this company have the infrastructure to get better, or will we have to build it from scratch?"
In addition, the compounding doesn't just operate within a single company, but across a portfolio. Firms that build AI-enabled GTM infrastructure consistently across multiple portcos gain the ability to identify what "good" looks like in a given segment by observing what works at scale, and then replicate it systematically. Which outbound signals most reliably predict sub-90-day sales cycles in vertical SaaS? Which expansion triggers drive the highest NRR in the $5–20M ARR range? What GTM tactics work the best with the ever changing market landscape? These are questions you can only answer with data across many companies.
"Most PE firms talk about learning from their portfolio, we are actually doing it. Similar GTM infrastructure across nearly 60 companies means patterns surface fast. Which playbooks drive pipeline in vertical SaaS, which use cases transfer directly, which ones need adapting. The rebuild-from-scratch tax disappears. That's where the compounding starts," said Chris Ross, Head of Portfolio Growth at Hg.
This is where PE firms have a structural advantage that individual companies don't. When the moat is speed, the ability to identify a winning tactic at one portco and deploy it across ten others compounds the benefit in a way no single company can replicate alone.
Ten years ago, ERP infrastructure became a diligence discount. Companies with fragmented back-office systems saw valuations marked down as buyers priced in the remediation cost. We believe GTM infrastructure will be following the same pattern. What's different this time is that the penalty isn't just the remediation cost: it's the compounding value the company has already failed to accumulate. Think the campaigns not run, the signals not captured, and the feedback loops not closed. That's harder to price and recover. Companies with defensible GTM infrastructure are being underwritten with conviction; companies without it are facing a new kind of scrutiny that goes well beyond what shows up in a standard QoE.
"We've seen this process play out before with ERP," said Steven Wastie, GTM Operating Partner at H.I.G. Capital. "The companies that dragged their feet lost years of operating leverage they couldn't get back. GTM infrastructure will be following the same script as AI redefines workflows, systems and organizations."
Where the Space Is Going
There's a deeper shift happening beneath the tactical question of which GTM workflows to automate, and it's worth naming directly when making infrastructure decisions for a portfolio company. The previous generation of GTM software was built primarily as a system of record. The CRM captured what happened, the MAP tracked engagement and the intent tool logged signals. Data flowed in, got cleaned, got organized, and sat there waiting for a human to act on it. The system's job was to remember.
What's emerging now is something categorically different: GTM infrastructure as a system of action and context. The gap between signal and response collapses. A company posts a new job description for a RevOps hire, triggers a workflow, enriches a contact record, scores the account against ICP, drafts a personalized outreach sequence, and routes it to the right rep all before a human has opened their laptop. The system interprets, decides, and acts.
That shift changes the infrastructure decision significantly. In a system-of-record world, the key questions were about data quality and CRM hygiene. In a system-of-action world, the key question is whether your infrastructure is built to orchestrate and whether it can connect signals to actions across tools, contexts, and workflows without requiring a human to mediate every step.
It also changes what "competitive moat" means in a commercial context. A lot of GTM over the past decade was built, implicitly, on friction and information asymmetry, that is on knowing things about prospects that competitors didn't or on buyer inertia making it easier to stay than to switch. AI is systematically dissolving both. Information that used to require six browser tabs and a research contractor is now a single prompt. Switching costs that relied on buyer laziness are being optimized away as agents evaluate alternatives on pure fit and price. The GTM approaches that hold their value in this environment aren't capitalizing on friction anymore. They're built around speed, context, and the ability to act on better signals faster than anyone else. That's the thread connecting the Three Laws of GTM to the infrastructure argument: the sustainable advantage was never the information itself, it was always the ability to find new advantages faster than competitors could copy the last ones.
One question PE operators are increasingly fielding from portco leadership: we're already getting pitched by OpenAI and Anthropic directly, do we need anything else? The answer matters for how you think about the infrastructure stack.
The model layer and the orchestration layer solve different problems. OpenAI and Anthropic provide the reasoning capability, e.g. the intelligence that can interpret a signal, draft a message, or summarize a call transcript. What they don't provide is the surrounding structure that makes that intelligence usable in a real business: the data pipelines that feed clean, enriched inputs into the model, the guardrails that keep outputs within defined parameters, the workflow logic that triggers the right action at the right time, and the handoff layer that writes results back into Salesforce, the data warehouse, or whatever system of record the portco runs on.
The orchestration layer matters especially for PE value creation teams, because what they need isn't open-ended AI experimentation. They need low-risk, repeatable playbooks they can deploy across a portfolio and defend in a board meeting. That means packaging proven GTM use cases, reducing the in-house build burden, and connecting model intelligence to the commercial systems portcos already use.
It also matters for the parts of the portfolio that don't look like SaaS. As more PE firms expand into healthcare, business services, and industrials, the GTM infrastructure problem becomes more difficult. Data is more fragmented, workflows are more complex and the sales motion often involves longer cycles, more stakeholders, and less digital exhaust to work from. These are exactly the conditions where the data and orchestration layer adds the most value because clean, well-formatted data does not exist yet and someone has to find the data and impose structure on fragmented data before a model can do anything useful with it. A healthcare services company with patient records in one system, referral relationships in another, and billing data in a third isn't going to get value from an AI by itself. It needs an enrichment and workflow layer that can unify those inputs and connect them to the commercial motion. That's a solvable problem, and the firms building this infrastructure in non-SaaS verticals now are accumulating a compounding advantage over competitors who are still waiting for their data to get clean on its own.
The firms that understand this distinction (infrastructure vs. tooling; system of action vs. system of record) are the ones building durable commercial advantages in their portfolios. Within 18–24 months, the practical expectation is that autonomous agents will be handling significant portions of account management, outbound sequencing, and expansion intelligence, while humans focus on relationship building and high judgment tasks. The companies that will be positioned to deploy those agents well are the ones building the data foundation and adopting the right infrastructure now.
Score Your Portfolio
The diligence table tells you where the problems are. This rubric gives you a starting point for how far each portco has to go. Score each dimension on a 1–3 scale. It typically takes about 15 minutes per company and surfaces the intervention priorities quickly.
Weighting note: if Data Foundation scores a 1, start there regardless of what the other dimensions show. Nothing downstream works reliably without clean, enriched, unified data. It's the dependency everything else sits on, and it's also where the ROI on fixing it tends to show up fastest.
Scores of 7–10 indicate immediate action is needed. The foundation work has to come first: clean, deduplicate, enrich, and establish a single source of truth for TAM definition.
Scores of 11–16 mean the foundation exists and needs acceleration; the focus shifts to deploying AI workflows across core revenue motions.
Companies approaching 17–21 are ready to work on feedback loops and compounding advantages. That's the flywheel where more usage generates richer data generates better performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does AI-enabled GTM actually mean for a PE portfolio company?
AI-enabled GTM means connecting data, enrichment, signals, and automated workflows so that commercial teams can act on better information faster, without proportionally scaling headcount. For portcos, it typically starts with data quality and account research, then expands to automated targeting, personalized outreach, and signal-triggered workflows across the revenue motion.
Which AI GTM use cases are production-ready today?
Account research and enrichment, company scoring with transparent logic, pre-meeting preparation, inbound qualification and routing, and intent signal tracking are all production-ready. Rep-in-the-loop workflows for personalized messaging also deliver reliable results when humans review AI drafts before anything reaches a prospect. Fully autonomous outbound SDRs are not yet production-ready and consistently underperform in practice.
How do PE firms adapt their GTM models as AI offerings change?
The firms generating the best results start narrow, deploying high-accuracy use cases first and expanding from there. They invest in change management alongside new infrastructure, re-skilling GTM leadership to think differently about their work in an AI-native environment. They also treat GTM vendor decisions as compounding infrastructure choices, not one-off procurement calls, because the infrastructure layer determines how fast the commercial function learns and adapts over the next several years.
Why isn't it enough to just use OpenAI or Anthropic directly?
Foundation models provide reasoning capability but not the surrounding structure a real business needs: clean data pipelines, workflow logic, guardrails, and handoff layers that write results back into Salesforce or a data warehouse. PE value creation teams specifically need low-risk, repeatable playbooks they can deploy across a portfolio, and that requires an orchestration layer on top of the model layer.
How does AI-enabled GTM infrastructure affect diligence and valuation?
Sophisticated buyers are beginning to price GTM infrastructure into diligence the same way ERP infrastructure was priced in a decade ago. Companies without clean data and orchestration infrastructure face scrutiny that goes beyond standard QoE metrics. The penalty isn't just remediation cost; it's the compounding value the company has already failed to accumulate through campaigns not run, signals not captured, and feedback loops not closed.
Acknowledgments
This paper was shaped by the generous input of our partners and leading PE practitioners. Thank you to Erik Kristjanson (Vista Equity Partners), Steven Wastie (H.I.G. Capital), Jack Claydon (Hg), and Chris Ross (Hg) for their candid feedback, challenge, and perspective throughout the drafting process.
Also, a huge amount of thanks is due to the Clay team who put this together including Sonia Hernandez, Mary Hanley, Lindsay Workman, Karan Parekh, Sameer Ziaee, Ziqi Deng, and Ted Brown.
The pace of change in AI is disorienting. Models turn over faster than planning cycles, the vendor landscape has sprawled into hundreds of tools all claiming to transform your commercial motion, and the rate of iteration is accelerating. This is landing at a particularly consequential moment for PE: the low-interest-rate era, when financial engineering could do most of the heavy lifting in value creation, is behind us. The firms generating the best returns today are doing it through operational improvement, and GTM has become a critical lever. Hiring at portcos is increasingly oriented around commercial capability, and the question of how to scale revenue without proportionally scaling headcount has moved to the center of every value creation conversation.
The result is a specific kind of anxiety we hear about constantly from GTM leaders and PE operators alike: an overwhelming desire to do something with AI, combined with genuine uncertainty about what that something is. Some functions have found clarity. For example, engineering and support both have trackable ROI and relatively contained error costs. GTM is different and we wrote about why in Three Laws of GTM:
"Generic outreach is just noise. You win by knowing something about your customers that competitors don't… Your only sustainable advantage is your ability to discover new advantages faster than competitors."
Iterative speed, then, is AI's real differentiator in GTM. Most PE portfolios have already extracted the easier efficiency gains of AI: chatbots, support deflection, coding assistants as cost-savings plays. But the real GTM upside is about agility. As Clay's cofounder Varun Anand alludes to in Hg's Orbit podcast, GTM alpha: the edge that lets you win deals competitors can't now erodes in two weeks rather than three months. The companies that win are no longer the ones who find one great campaign and scale it. They're the ones who can discover new advantages continuously, faster than competitors can copy them.
That adaptive philosophy is what we at Clay bring to our work with PE firms and their portfolios. We're working with Hg, a leading investor in European and transatlantic technology and services businesses with over $100 billion in assets under management. 62% of their portfolio companies are now in active pilots or implementation phase (read more here). What follows is the playbook we've developed from our work with Hg and a few other PE partners.
TL;DR
- AI-enabled GTM is now a primary value creation lever for PE: the biggest gains are in sales productivity and GTM automation, not just engineering or support cost reduction.
- Not all AI GTM tools are production-ready. Account research, enrichment, and rep-in-the-loop workflows deliver reliable ROI today. Fully autonomous outbound SDRs consistently underperform and damage domain reputation.
- Data quality is the highest-ROI starting point. Portcos that fix contact coverage and CRM hygiene first see faster, more durable downstream gains from every subsequent AI workflow.
- AI-enabled GTM compounds across a portfolio. PE firms that standardize GTM infrastructure across portcos can identify winning playbooks at one company and deploy them across ten others, faster than any single company can replicate alone.
How AI-Enabled GTM Is Reshaping the Rule of 40
PE-backed software companies live and die by the Rule of 40: a company's combined revenue growth rate and profit margin should exceed 40%. That benchmark is about to shift structurally, and the GTM function is one of the areas where the shift will be most pronounced.
Two cost lines are already compressing measurably. AI code assistants are delivering 20–45% productivity gains per developer, according to McKinsey's controlled studies of engineering spend. AI-powered support tools like Intercom Fin, Decagon, and Sierra are handling tier-one tickets and routine triage at scale. Real, capturable gains, and increasingly, a floor-level expectation among sophisticated buyers evaluating software companies.
The less-explored frontier is S&M. Sales and marketing runs at 20–50% of revenue in growth-stage B2B SaaS; it's routinely the single largest cost line in a portfolio company's P&L. The reason it's less explored isn't that the opportunity is smaller, but rather that GTM is harder to automate after all. But for operators who understand how to sequence the rollout, the math is compelling. Agentic workflows can compress BDR research, targeting, personalization, and execution time spent and in turn drives up the pipeline and revenue per rep.
The growth-side math is equally compelling, and it typically starts with something simpler than operators expect: data quality. When a portco increases contact coverage through filling gaps in enrichment, cleaning duplicates, and building a more complete org-level picture of the ICP, the downstream effect is real. For example, Verkada increased contact data coverage in their TAM from 50% to 80%. Reps reach the right people on the first contact, expansion workflows fire on complete records and automated targeting becomes reliable. That 30% data fix translates directly to pipeline and revenue. It's also usually the highest-ROI intervention available at the start of a transformation, because everything downstream depends on and benefits from it.
There's a second dimension worth highlighting here as portcos make decisions on GTM vendors. There are often 10 or more point solutions that make up a typical portco's GTM stack: everything from workflow tools to enrichment vendors to sequencing platforms. And they are all under competitive pressure from AI. Agentic coding tools now allow startups to replicate mid-market SaaS functionality in weeks, undercutting legacy pricing models and forcing enterprise buyers to ask whether they should build rather than buy. This makes the infrastructure-versus-tooling distinction more consequential than it might appear in a normal market. Point solutions built around automating a specific manual workflow face a different competitive dynamic than infrastructure built around orchestrating data and driving action across the commercial function. The former can be replicated, but the latter compounds with use. In other words, GTM vendor decisions at portcos aren't purely a procurement call, but a compounding infrastructure decision: one that will determine how fast the commercial function learns, adapts, and widens its lead over the next five years.
What Works, What Doesn't, and Why Most Vendor Pitches Get It Wrong
PE operating partners are sitting through a lot of vendor pitches right now. There are autonomous SDR companies, AI email platforms, and "agentic outbound" startups galore. A handful will generate real returns. The majority will burn through budget and erode organizational trust in AI as a category, the kind of damage that takes quarters to repair and makes every subsequent implementation harder to justify internally.
From our vantage point working closely with GTM teams and seeing how hundreds of mid market and enterprise companies structure their GTM workflows, the landscape breaks into three tiers.
Production-ready today: account research and enrichment, company scoring with transparent logic, and pre-meeting preparation that combines CRM history with third-party enrichment. These work for a specific reason: the correctness bar is relatively low, outputs are easy for a human to validate in seconds, and mistakes don't damage customer relationships. A company score reading '85: hiring RevOps, raised Series B, matches ICP on six dimensions' is useful at 80% accuracy, and it gets better as the data improves. For a 50-person sales team taking four meetings daily, automated research reclaims 50+ hours per week, which is the equivalent of a full-time research analyst.
Rep-in-the-loop workflows: personalized messaging, contact prioritization, and basic objection handling. The consistent pattern here is AI drafts, humans validate before anything reaches a prospect. A rep can review ten AI-generated emails in the time it takes to write two from scratch. But removing the human review step introduces error rates on three fronts: tone, relevance, and factual accuracy. All three damage response rates and brand perception in ways that compound over time. The economics still favor a human-reviewed AI workflow over a fully manual one, and in our experience, reps prefer it once they've used it for a week.
Not ready for production yet (this is where most of the damage happens): fully autonomous outbound SDRs, where AI handles TAM sourcing, targeting, messaging, sending, objection handling, and meeting booking without human involvement. The failure pattern is remarkably consistent. Week one it looks promising with a few meetings booked and enough to generate false confidence. Week two, open rates decline as the system trains spam filters against the company domain. Week three, messaging quality degrades with no learning loop but repetition at scale. By month one, it burned through target accounts, damaged domain reputation, and generated minimal pipelines.
One thing we hear consistently from operators who've been through successful implementations is that the technology is the easy part; the harder challenge is change management which includes re-skilling GTM leadership and practitioners to think differently about their work in an AI-native environment. Long-entrenched workflows, quarterly campaign planning, and siloed team structures don't change just because a new tool gets deployed. Leaders need to invest in helping their people develop new mental models alongside the new infrastructure.
We have seen repeatedly that starting with narrow, high-accuracy use cases like account research, intent signal tracking, pre-meeting briefs, inbound qualification and routing and expanding from there consistently outperforms broad deployments that spread across too many tasks at once.
One caveat to this framing: these tiers shift as the technology matures. What's unreliable today may be production-ready in a matter of months to years. The evaluation framework stays constant regardless: assess accuracy in context, measure the cost of errors, decide whether human oversight is worth the throughput tradeoff, and revisit the tier placement quarterly.
AI-Enabled GTM in Action: Portfolio Company Results
A-LIGN (Hg portfolio company) is a cybersecurity compliance firm serving 5,000+ organizations globally. The starting point was familiar to anyone who's audited a portco's commercial function. A-LIGN was paying $60K annually for a contractor to manually research 2,000 accounts over six months. The output was a spreadsheet with basic yes/no answers: Does this company do SOC 2 audits? Yes. Does it have a compliance program? Yes. Accurate, but thin, and not particularly actionable.
Their ops leader identified the core problem clearly: the data told reps that a company does SOC 2 audits, but what reps actually needed to know was who does their SOC 2 and why. Which competitor holds the relationship? What's the contract cycle? What compliance framework gaps exist? The data wasn't actionable. It was a filing cabinet with 2,000 folders and no context inside any of them.
Building automated research workflows on Clay, A-LIGN replaced six months of manual work with one month of automated execution. 30,000 basic data points became 450,000 detailed insights, a 15x increase in data depth at a cost of $50K for the platform, down from $60K for the manual contractor. At the same time, Salesforce admin work dropped from 48 hours to 2 hours per cycle.
Now, instead of telling reps "this company does compliance," the system showed which specific services they used, why they needed them, which competitors held the relationship, and where the switching triggers were. That intelligence powered a competitive displacement workflow that hadn't existed before without the data layer underneath it. This resulted in $5.7M in qualified pipeline from competitive displacement research alone and $3.3M in closed revenue directly attributed to displacement intelligence.
The cultural shift that followed may be the most durable outcome. Non-technical reps started defaulting to "can we automate this?" when they hit a manual process. A-LIGN now treats Clay as core revenue infrastructure, a difference between a software purchase and an operating and cultural shift.
Terrapinn, a global B2B events company with 150 sales reps covering 35 industry verticals, had a different bottleneck: their third-party data provider delivered static lists with no enrichment, no signals, and no context about why a prospect belonged at a specific event. Clay replaced months of researcher work with enriched, signal-based prospect lists built in minutes, ICP-matched across all 35 verticals, updated in real time. Revenue per rep increased 19% while prospect acquisition cost dropped 90%. For a 150-person sales organization, that combination changes the unit economics of the commercial model materially.
Recharge, the subscription billing platform processing $30 billion annually for 20,000+ merchants, had the opposite problem. They weren't missing data but had ten years of customer and product data sitting in siloed systems. Clay unified and connected it to campaign execution. One campaign per quarter became eight simultaneous campaigns. Opportunity conversion improved 20%, meeting conversion improved 12%, and call conversion improved 8x. Instead of adding net new data points, Clay made the existing data actionable.
These aren't isolated wins. They're outputs of the same underlying architecture which is vertical-agnostic by design. A-LIGN's workflow runs on enriched account intelligence, competitor relationship mapping, and contract cycle signals. Terrapinn's runs on enriched firmographics and event-matched ICPs. Recharge's runs on unified product data connected to campaign execution. The surface details differ by industry but the underlying architecture stays the same. A workflow built for cybersecurity compliance can be reconfigured for healthcare SaaS, professional services, or fintech with the inputs swapped and the logic intact as the underlying pattern is always the same: source, enrich, score, trigger, and act. That's what makes GTM playbook building a compounding asset for PE operators specifically. Each implementation produces a documented template and makes the next deployment faster and cheaper.
The Diligence Red Flag Isn't the Metrics
The most important thing to understand about AI-enabled GTM is that it compounds. A company that builds clean data infrastructure, instruments its signals, and connects those signals to automated action gets more efficient and more intelligent over time. More campaigns generate more outcome data, better outcome data improves targeting and better targeting improves conversion. Higher conversion funds more experimentation. Each cycle tightens the loop. The advantage is exponential.
Companies without data and orchestration infrastructure can't access this loop. They run campaigns manually, gather data inconsistently, and make decisions on intuition or lagging reports. Each quarter, they're roughly as good at GTM as they were the quarter before. Meanwhile, the company with the right infrastructure layer is compounding. That gap is what we suspect sophisticated buyers are beginning to price into diligence.
"Clean, enriched CRM data is now table stakes across the portfolio, you can't run a modern GTM organization without it," said Jack Claydon, AI Value Creation at Hg. "What's exciting is what comes next: orchestration workflows that automate key commercial processes, driving efficiency gains whilst simultaneously improving sales performance. That's where the real value creation is happening."
The metrics that surface it aren't new, but their interpretation has changed. Historically, a declining win rate or rising CAC was a signal of execution problems: the wrong messaging, the wrong reps, or the wrong segments. Today those same signals increasingly indicate a structural deficit including the absence of feedback infrastructure that would have caught and corrected those problems automatically. The question a buyer is now asking isn't just "why are these numbers bad?" It's "does this company have the infrastructure to get better, or will we have to build it from scratch?"
In addition, the compounding doesn't just operate within a single company, but across a portfolio. Firms that build AI-enabled GTM infrastructure consistently across multiple portcos gain the ability to identify what "good" looks like in a given segment by observing what works at scale, and then replicate it systematically. Which outbound signals most reliably predict sub-90-day sales cycles in vertical SaaS? Which expansion triggers drive the highest NRR in the $5–20M ARR range? What GTM tactics work the best with the ever changing market landscape? These are questions you can only answer with data across many companies.
"Most PE firms talk about learning from their portfolio, we are actually doing it. Similar GTM infrastructure across nearly 60 companies means patterns surface fast. Which playbooks drive pipeline in vertical SaaS, which use cases transfer directly, which ones need adapting. The rebuild-from-scratch tax disappears. That's where the compounding starts," said Chris Ross, Head of Portfolio Growth at Hg.
This is where PE firms have a structural advantage that individual companies don't. When the moat is speed, the ability to identify a winning tactic at one portco and deploy it across ten others compounds the benefit in a way no single company can replicate alone.
Ten years ago, ERP infrastructure became a diligence discount. Companies with fragmented back-office systems saw valuations marked down as buyers priced in the remediation cost. We believe GTM infrastructure will be following the same pattern. What's different this time is that the penalty isn't just the remediation cost: it's the compounding value the company has already failed to accumulate. Think the campaigns not run, the signals not captured, and the feedback loops not closed. That's harder to price and recover. Companies with defensible GTM infrastructure are being underwritten with conviction; companies without it are facing a new kind of scrutiny that goes well beyond what shows up in a standard QoE.
"We've seen this process play out before with ERP," said Steven Wastie, GTM Operating Partner at H.I.G. Capital. "The companies that dragged their feet lost years of operating leverage they couldn't get back. GTM infrastructure will be following the same script as AI redefines workflows, systems and organizations."
Where the Space Is Going
There's a deeper shift happening beneath the tactical question of which GTM workflows to automate, and it's worth naming directly when making infrastructure decisions for a portfolio company. The previous generation of GTM software was built primarily as a system of record. The CRM captured what happened, the MAP tracked engagement and the intent tool logged signals. Data flowed in, got cleaned, got organized, and sat there waiting for a human to act on it. The system's job was to remember.
What's emerging now is something categorically different: GTM infrastructure as a system of action and context. The gap between signal and response collapses. A company posts a new job description for a RevOps hire, triggers a workflow, enriches a contact record, scores the account against ICP, drafts a personalized outreach sequence, and routes it to the right rep all before a human has opened their laptop. The system interprets, decides, and acts.
That shift changes the infrastructure decision significantly. In a system-of-record world, the key questions were about data quality and CRM hygiene. In a system-of-action world, the key question is whether your infrastructure is built to orchestrate and whether it can connect signals to actions across tools, contexts, and workflows without requiring a human to mediate every step.
It also changes what "competitive moat" means in a commercial context. A lot of GTM over the past decade was built, implicitly, on friction and information asymmetry, that is on knowing things about prospects that competitors didn't or on buyer inertia making it easier to stay than to switch. AI is systematically dissolving both. Information that used to require six browser tabs and a research contractor is now a single prompt. Switching costs that relied on buyer laziness are being optimized away as agents evaluate alternatives on pure fit and price. The GTM approaches that hold their value in this environment aren't capitalizing on friction anymore. They're built around speed, context, and the ability to act on better signals faster than anyone else. That's the thread connecting the Three Laws of GTM to the infrastructure argument: the sustainable advantage was never the information itself, it was always the ability to find new advantages faster than competitors could copy the last ones.
One question PE operators are increasingly fielding from portco leadership: we're already getting pitched by OpenAI and Anthropic directly, do we need anything else? The answer matters for how you think about the infrastructure stack.
The model layer and the orchestration layer solve different problems. OpenAI and Anthropic provide the reasoning capability, e.g. the intelligence that can interpret a signal, draft a message, or summarize a call transcript. What they don't provide is the surrounding structure that makes that intelligence usable in a real business: the data pipelines that feed clean, enriched inputs into the model, the guardrails that keep outputs within defined parameters, the workflow logic that triggers the right action at the right time, and the handoff layer that writes results back into Salesforce, the data warehouse, or whatever system of record the portco runs on.
The orchestration layer matters especially for PE value creation teams, because what they need isn't open-ended AI experimentation. They need low-risk, repeatable playbooks they can deploy across a portfolio and defend in a board meeting. That means packaging proven GTM use cases, reducing the in-house build burden, and connecting model intelligence to the commercial systems portcos already use.
It also matters for the parts of the portfolio that don't look like SaaS. As more PE firms expand into healthcare, business services, and industrials, the GTM infrastructure problem becomes more difficult. Data is more fragmented, workflows are more complex and the sales motion often involves longer cycles, more stakeholders, and less digital exhaust to work from. These are exactly the conditions where the data and orchestration layer adds the most value because clean, well-formatted data does not exist yet and someone has to find the data and impose structure on fragmented data before a model can do anything useful with it. A healthcare services company with patient records in one system, referral relationships in another, and billing data in a third isn't going to get value from an AI by itself. It needs an enrichment and workflow layer that can unify those inputs and connect them to the commercial motion. That's a solvable problem, and the firms building this infrastructure in non-SaaS verticals now are accumulating a compounding advantage over competitors who are still waiting for their data to get clean on its own.
The firms that understand this distinction (infrastructure vs. tooling; system of action vs. system of record) are the ones building durable commercial advantages in their portfolios. Within 18–24 months, the practical expectation is that autonomous agents will be handling significant portions of account management, outbound sequencing, and expansion intelligence, while humans focus on relationship building and high judgment tasks. The companies that will be positioned to deploy those agents well are the ones building the data foundation and adopting the right infrastructure now.
Score Your Portfolio
The diligence table tells you where the problems are. This rubric gives you a starting point for how far each portco has to go. Score each dimension on a 1–3 scale. It typically takes about 15 minutes per company and surfaces the intervention priorities quickly.
Weighting note: if Data Foundation scores a 1, start there regardless of what the other dimensions show. Nothing downstream works reliably without clean, enriched, unified data. It's the dependency everything else sits on, and it's also where the ROI on fixing it tends to show up fastest.
Scores of 7–10 indicate immediate action is needed. The foundation work has to come first: clean, deduplicate, enrich, and establish a single source of truth for TAM definition.
Scores of 11–16 mean the foundation exists and needs acceleration; the focus shifts to deploying AI workflows across core revenue motions.
Companies approaching 17–21 are ready to work on feedback loops and compounding advantages. That's the flywheel where more usage generates richer data generates better performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does AI-enabled GTM actually mean for a PE portfolio company?
AI-enabled GTM means connecting data, enrichment, signals, and automated workflows so that commercial teams can act on better information faster, without proportionally scaling headcount. For portcos, it typically starts with data quality and account research, then expands to automated targeting, personalized outreach, and signal-triggered workflows across the revenue motion.
Which AI GTM use cases are production-ready today?
Account research and enrichment, company scoring with transparent logic, pre-meeting preparation, inbound qualification and routing, and intent signal tracking are all production-ready. Rep-in-the-loop workflows for personalized messaging also deliver reliable results when humans review AI drafts before anything reaches a prospect. Fully autonomous outbound SDRs are not yet production-ready and consistently underperform in practice.
How do PE firms adapt their GTM models as AI offerings change?
The firms generating the best results start narrow, deploying high-accuracy use cases first and expanding from there. They invest in change management alongside new infrastructure, re-skilling GTM leadership to think differently about their work in an AI-native environment. They also treat GTM vendor decisions as compounding infrastructure choices, not one-off procurement calls, because the infrastructure layer determines how fast the commercial function learns and adapts over the next several years.
Why isn't it enough to just use OpenAI or Anthropic directly?
Foundation models provide reasoning capability but not the surrounding structure a real business needs: clean data pipelines, workflow logic, guardrails, and handoff layers that write results back into Salesforce or a data warehouse. PE value creation teams specifically need low-risk, repeatable playbooks they can deploy across a portfolio, and that requires an orchestration layer on top of the model layer.
How does AI-enabled GTM infrastructure affect diligence and valuation?
Sophisticated buyers are beginning to price GTM infrastructure into diligence the same way ERP infrastructure was priced in a decade ago. Companies without clean data and orchestration infrastructure face scrutiny that goes beyond standard QoE metrics. The penalty isn't just remediation cost; it's the compounding value the company has already failed to accumulate through campaigns not run, signals not captured, and feedback loops not closed.
Acknowledgments
This paper was shaped by the generous input of our partners and leading PE practitioners. Thank you to Erik Kristjanson (Vista Equity Partners), Steven Wastie (H.I.G. Capital), Jack Claydon (Hg), and Chris Ross (Hg) for their candid feedback, challenge, and perspective throughout the drafting process.
Also, a huge amount of thanks is due to the Clay team who put this together including Sonia Hernandez, Mary Hanley, Lindsay Workman, Karan Parekh, Sameer Ziaee, Ziqi Deng, and Ted Brown.